Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Medical Slides
Generate publication-quality abdominal aortic aneurysm lecture slides in 30 seconds. AI-powered content structured for clinical education.
Generate Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm DeckWhy teach Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm?
Abdominal aortic aneurysm affects 4-8% of men over 65, and ruptured AAA carries an overall mortality of 80-90% (including pre-hospital deaths). The USPSTF recommends one-time ultrasound screening for men aged 65-75 who have ever smoked. Elective repair is recommended at diameter ≥5.5 cm in men (≥5.0 cm in women) based on the UK Small Aneurysm Trial and ADAM trial. EVAR versus open repair remains an active debate, with the DREAM, EVAR-1, and OVER trials providing long-term comparative data.
What AI generates for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Enter “Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm” and SlideCraft generates a complete lecture deck with slides like these.
See it in action
Type any medical topic and watch AI generate a presentation slide in seconds. No signup required.
3 free previews per hour · No account needed
Enter a topic and click Generate to see your AI slide
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presentation FAQ
How should EVAR vs open repair long-term data be presented?
Present the trial evolution: EVAR-1 (2004): EVAR had lower 30-day mortality (1.6% vs 4.7%). However, 15-year follow-up (2020): no difference in overall survival, EVAR had higher reintervention rate (26% vs 11%), and late AAA-related mortality was higher with EVAR (due to endoleak-related ruptures and reinterventions). OVER trial (2019, 14-year follow-up): similar findings — early EVAR advantage lost by 3 years, no long-term survival benefit. DREAM trial (2017): confirmed no survival benefit at 12 years. Teaching message: EVAR reduces early mortality but requires lifelong surveillance CT and has higher reintervention rates. Open repair is more durable. Patient selection should consider age, fitness, and ability to comply with long-term surveillance.
What endoleak classification should be included?
Present the five types with management: Type I (attachment site leak — proximal Ia or distal Ib) — high pressure, mandates immediate repair (extension cuff, conversion). Type II (retrograde flow from branch vessels — lumbar, IMA) — most common, low pressure, usually benign, observe if sac is stable; intervene if sac growth >5 mm. Type III (graft defect — fabric tear or modular disconnection) — high pressure, requires repair. Type IV (graft porosity) — transient, self-limiting, observed post-implantation. Type V (endotension — sac expansion without identifiable leak) — controversial, manage on case-by-case basis. Surveillance: CT angiography at 1 month, 6 months, then annually post-EVAR.
How should ruptured AAA emergency management be taught?
Present the emergency protocol: (1) Permissive hypotension — target SBP 70-90 mmHg (maintain consciousness), avoid aggressive fluid resuscitation (dislodges retroperitoneal tamponade). (2) Emergency imaging — unstable patients with known AAA → OR immediately. Hemodynamically responsive → CT angiography to assess EVAR suitability. (3) Repair strategy: IMPROVE trial (2014) showed emergency EVAR (when anatomically suitable) versus open repair had similar 30-day mortality (~35% overall), but EVAR had shorter ICU stay and lower cost at 3 years. Approximately 60% of ruptured AAA are anatomically suitable for EVAR. (4) Damage control: if no EVAR capability, aortic balloon occlusion (REBOA) or supraceliac clamp, infrarenal tube graft, damage control if coagulopathic.
Simple pricing, no surprises
Start free today. Upgrade when your department needs more.
Free
Try SlideCraft with no commitment
- 2 decks per month
- AI slides with speaker notes
- View & present only (no export)
- 7-day cloud storage
- Slide Checker & Outline Generator
Pro
For clinicians who lecture weekly
- 10 decks/mo + $2.50/extra
- AI Critic Mode (5-axis review)
- Document-to-deck (PDF upload)
- PDF, PPTX, SCORM & image export
- Permanent cloud storage
Expert
For academic physicians who publish and present
- 25 decks/mo + $2.00/extra
- PubMed source verification
- Paper-to-deck pipeline
- Auto-citations (Vancouver)
- Everything in Pro